ANALYSIS

Netherlands’ New Strictest-Ever Immigration Policy

The Netherlands’ new immigration policy represents a significant shift towards stricter controls and a more nationalist approach to migration and asylum.
In addition to asylum policies, the coalition aims to curb labor migration and impose stricter regulations on the admittance of foreign students to Dutch universities to protect domestic labor markets.
The policy shift has attracted criticism from human rights organizations and foreign governments, who argue that the new measures contravene international humanitarian principles and could lead to increased suffering for asylum seekers.

Share

This post is also available in: Türkçe Русский

A new coalition government in the Netherlands has imposed the harshest immigration laws it has ever had, drawing attention from around the world. The alliance, created by the BBB, the conservative NSC party, Geert Wilders’ PVV, and departing Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s VVD, intends to make major adjustments to immigration, refugee, and labor laws. The reasons for these policies, as well as their implications and possible outcomes within the larger European context, will all be covered in this examination.

Right-wing populism has been gaining popularity in Dutch politics due to worries about immigration, national security, and the integration of cultures. These ideas have been greatly influenced by Geert Wilders, a controversial personality most known for his anti-Islamic and anti-immigration statements. After months of negotiations, the coalition agreement was struck, and it represents a broader European trend of tightening immigration laws in reaction to threats to national security and identity. Furthermore, the growth of populist attitudes throughout Europe, fueled by worries about security and the economy, has produced a political climate in which support for these policies is vital. Stricter immigration laws, according to the coalition partners, are necessary to uphold social order and safeguard the Dutch way of life. They raise issues with immigrant integration, the burden on public services, and the requirement to maintain cultural cohesiveness.

The cornerstone of the new policy is the introduction of the strictest asylum regime in Dutch history. This includes stronger border controls and harsher rules for asylum seekers to reduce the number of new arrivals. The coalition plans to submit an opt-out clause to the European Commission, seeking exemption from specific EU asylum rules that they believe are too lenient​.[i] The suggested actions include lengthier detention times for asylum applicants. At the same time, their cases are being reviewed, quicker deportations of those whose requests are denied, and more stringent standards for obtaining asylum. According to the administration, these steps are required to stop illegal immigration and make sure that refuge is only given to those who truly need it.

In addition to asylum policies, the coalition aims to curb labor migration and impose stricter regulations on the admittance of foreign students to Dutch universities. Workers from outside the EU will require specific knowledge or expertise to obtain work permits, and recruiting agencies will face stricter oversight. These measures are intended to protect domestic labor markets and ensure that migration serves the national interest​.[ii]

The new government also plans significant budget cuts, including 14 billion euros in spending reductions by 2028. These cuts will affect development aid, government salaries, and public broadcasting. Additionally, the coalition has committed to spending at least 2% of GDP on defense, aligning with NATO agreements. These economic policies reflect a prioritization of national security and fiscal conservatism​.[iii]

These policies’ implementation is probably going to have a big impact on Dutch society. Stronger immigration laws, according to supporters, are required to preserve social harmony and safeguard national security. Critics caution that taking such action might deepen societal rifts and encourage xenophobia. Restrictions on foreign student enrollment and labor migration may also have an impact on the economy, possibly resulting in a labor shortage in some industries and a drop in the international competitiveness of Dutch institutions. Moreover, the Netherlands’ position as a leader in worldwide humanitarianism may be jeopardized by the budget cuts, especially in development assistance. Cuts to public broadcasting funding might also have an effect on the independence and caliber of Dutch media, which is vital to a democratic society.

The Netherlands’ decision to seek an opt-out from EU asylum rules places it on a collision course with Brussels. The European Union’s common asylum policy aims to distribute the responsibility of asylum seekers among member states, and unilateral opt-outs could undermine this collective approach. The Dutch move may inspire other countries to pursue similar exemptions, potentially leading to a fragmentation of EU asylum policies​.

Internationally, the policy shift has attracted criticism from human rights organizations and foreign governments. They argue that the new measures contravene international humanitarian principles and could lead to increased suffering for asylum seekers. The proposed relocation of the Dutch embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem has also sparked controversy, as it touches on the sensitive issue of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and diverges from the international consensus. The policy changes reflect a broader trend of rising nationalism and skepticism towards the EU in several member states. If other countries follow the Netherlands’ lead, it could pose a significant challenge to EU cohesion and the principle of shared responsibility in managing migration. This could lead to more stringent border controls within the EU, undermining the Schengen Agreement and the notion of free movement across member states.

The Netherlands’ new immigration policy represents a significant shift towards stricter controls and a more nationalist approach to migration and asylum. While it addresses domestic concerns over security and social cohesion, it also raises important questions about human rights, international solidarity, and the future of European integration. The policy’s long-term success will depend on its implementation and the ability of the Dutch government to balance these competing interests. As the Netherlands navigates these complex issues, the broader European and international community will be closely watching. The outcome of these policies could set a precedent for other nations grappling with similar challenges, influencing the global discourse on migration, asylum, and national security.


[i] “New Dutch government vows to opt out of EU rules to bring in ‘strictest-ever’ asylum policy”, Evening Standard, https://www.standard.co.uk/news/world/netherlands-asylum-eu-rules-geert-wilders-coalition-b1158273.html, (Date of Access: 01.07.2024).

[ii] Ibid.

[iii] Ibid.

Adila GASİMOVA
Adila GASİMOVA
Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi (ODTÜ), İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Siyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Bölümü

Similar Posts