Analysis

Russia Seizes Deutsche Bank and Commerzbank Assets

A court in St. Petersburg has ordered the seizure of Deutsche Bank and Commerzbank's assets, accounts, property and shares in the country.
The seizure of Commerzbank and UniCredit's assets by Russian courts shows that the sanctions imposed on Russia by Western countries can have profound and unpredictable effects on the international banking sector.
The seizure of the banks' assets in Russia will impact their global operations, requiring extensive adjustments to their risk management strategies and geopolitical risk assessments.

Share

This post is also available in: Türkçe Русский

As the Russian-Western standoff continues, a court in St. Petersburg has ordered the seizure of assets, accounts, property and shares of Deutsche Bank and Commerzbank in the country. The case, initiated by RusChemAlliance, a joint venture significantly owned by Russian gas giant Gazprom, concerns the termination of a major gas processing plant project involving Germany’s Linde.[1] It highlights the deepening complexities and operational challenges faced by foreign banks operating in Russia amid ongoing geopolitical tensions and sanctions regimes.

The court decision stems from a lawsuit related to the canceled construction of a liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal in the Baltic Sea. The project, originally undertaken by Renaissance Heavy Industries and the German company Linde, was guaranteed by banks, but came to a halt due to the imposition of Western sanctions following Russia’s aggression in Ukraine. The LNG terminal project, managed by RusChemAlliance, a subsidiary of Russian gas giant Gazprom, was halted at the request of RusChemAlliance. RusChemAlliance, the operator of the project, had made an advance payment to Linde for the construction of a gas processing plant.

According to the German news agency DPA, with the project canceled, the company sought financial compensation from Deutsche Bank for approximately €238.61 million ($260 million) and Commerzbank for €94.92 million ($103 million). Western sanctions against Russia led to the withdrawal of bank guarantees that were part of the contracts to ensure the completion of the project.This withdrawal has led RusChemAlliance to file a lawsuit seeking compensation for investments made before the end of the project.Deutsche Bank announced that it has recognized a provision of approximately EUR 260 million ($283 million) under an indemnification agreement relating to the project.[2] The Bank emphasized the immediate operational consequences of this court decision in Russia and the need to assess the Russian courts’ position on the claim.

For Deutsche Bank, the court ordered the seizure of up to EUR 238.6 million ($259 million) in various types of assets, including securities, real estate and bank accounts. In response, Deutsche Bank’s headquarters in Frankfurt announced that they have already made provisions of approximately €260 million, taking into account the financial impact of the case. “We will need to see how this claim is implemented by the Russian courts and assess the immediate operational impact in Russia,” the bank said. Nevertheless, Deutsche Bank revised its 2024 year-end target for the S&P 500 to 5,500, the highest among large brokerages, citing strong corporate earnings as the main reason for this optimism.[3] Deutsche Bank’s provisioning of approximately EUR 260 million under an indemnification agreement demonstrates its foresight in financial risk management.

Similarly, Commerzbank faced the seizure of assets worth €93.7 million ($101.85 million), including securities and a substantial property in the center of Moscow. As of the latest reports, Commerzbank has not issued a statement or response to the court’s decision.

In addition to these actions, the Russian court ordered the seizure of assets, accounts, property and shares in two subsidiaries of UniCredit (CRDI.MI) as part of a related case.[4]

In this case, the LNG terminal project in the Baltic Sea, a major venture involving Renaissance Heavy Industry and the German company Linde, fell victim to these broader geopolitical dynamics. With significant financial support and international cooperation, the project aimed to strengthen energy infrastructure and increase gas processing capacity. As a result of sanctions, Deutsche Bank and Commerzbank withdrew their guarantees, leading to the cancellation of the project and a lawsuit filed by RusChemAlliance.

The comprehensive and multifaceted sanctions imposed on Russia by Western countries in response to its invasion of Ukraine are intended to isolate the country economically and put pressure on it to change its political and military strategies. However, the ripple effects of these sanctions extend far beyond their direct target, affecting international business relations and operations.

The court-ordered seizure of Deutsche Bank and Commerzbank’s assets in Russia marks an important moment when geopolitical tensions and international trade intersect. It underscores the profound and often unpredictable consequences that geopolitical tensions and economic sanctions can have on multinational companies, particularly in the banking sector.

The broader context of the legal dispute has been the wide-ranging sanctions imposed on Russia by Western countries in response to its invasion of Ukraine two years ago. These sanctions have created complex legal and financial challenges, disrupting various international business deals and financial operations involving Russian entities and Western firms.

The court decision exemplifies the far-reaching effects of geopolitical conflicts on global business activities, where legal and financial systems intersect with international relations. The asset seizure underscores the significant risks and uncertainties faced by multinational companies and financial institutions operating in regions affected by political and economic sanctions. As the situation evolves, banks will need to navigate the legal implications and operational impact of this decision, balance compliance with international sanctions and manage their financial risks in Russia.

For Deutsche Bank and Commerzbank, operational results matter. The seizure of their assets in Russia could disrupt their local operations, affect their ability to serve their customers and lead to further financial scrutiny. Banks would need to reassess their risks in Russia. In addition, asset seizures could affect banks’ global operations. It may require adjustments to risk management frameworks, particularly in relation to projects in politically unstable regions. It also highlights the importance of comprehensive geopolitical risk assessments and the need for contingency planning in international business activities.

The consequences of the incident go beyond Deutsche Bank and Commerzbank and serve as a cautionary example for other multinational companies with exposure to high-risk jurisdictions. This incident highlights the critical need for robust risk assessment and management strategies that take into account geopolitical uncertainties. Companies may need to diversify their investments, reduce their dependence on regions with high political risks, and improve their legal and financial safeguards. Going forward, Deutsche Bank and Commerzbank are likely to engage in protracted legal battles to challenge or settle asset seizures.

These cases will be closely monitored by the international business and legal communities and may affect the following issues.

The resolution of the dispute will also have implications for the wider financial sector. It may prompt banks and other financial institutions to reassess their exposure to politically unstable regions and strengthen their legal and financial protections against similar risks.

It emphasizes the critical importance of comprehensive risk management, strategic planning and the ability to navigate complex legal and regulatory environments. As this evolves, it will provide valuable insights into the resilience and adaptability of multinational companies in the face of geopolitical instability and economic sanctions. The outcome of this dispute will have lasting implications for international business activities and the strategies used to manage geopolitical risks in an increasingly interconnected world.


[1] “Russian court freezes assets of 2 German banks in gas project dispute”, AP News, https://apnews.com/article/deutsche-bank-assets-frozen-sanctions-gas-russia-8563331741bb8e04f6a5de7128ddf0cd#, (Date of Access: 20.05.2024).

[2] Ibid.

[3] “Deutsche Bank lifts S&P 500 year-end target to Street-high of 5,500”, Reuters, https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/deutsche-bank-lifts-sp-500-year-end-target-street-high-5500-2024-05-20/, (Date of Access: 20.05.2024).

[4] “Russian court seizes Deutsche Bank, Commerzbank assets as part of lawsuit”, Reuters, https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/russian-court-seizes-deutsche-bank-assets-part-lawsuit-2024-05-18/, (Date of Access: 20.05.2024).

Melike AKIN
Melike AKIN
Melike Akın graduated from Akdeniz University, Department of International Relations in 2021 with her graduation thesis titled "The Aegean Problem in Turkish-Greek Relations". Since 2022, she has been continuing her master's programme with the thesis titled "The EU's Energy Quest after the Ukraine War: The Southern Gas Corridor as an Alternative" at Akdeniz University, Department of International Relations. Melike is fluent in English and her main areas of interest include the European Union, energy diplomacy and international organisations.

Similar Posts